Skip to main content

30-06-2020 | Oncology | News | Article

Salvage nivolumab–ipilimumab shows potential for some metastatic RCC patients

Hannah Kitt

medwireNews: The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrates antitumor activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) previously exposed to PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors, say the authors of a chart review.

They analyzed data from 45 patients treated with the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab plus the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab at one of five US centers after receiving prior treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) targeting the PD-1 pathway; participants had not previously received a CTLA-4 inhibitor.

During a median follow-up of 12 months, 20% of patients receiving the combination achieved an objective response, where all responses were partial and lasted for a median of 7 months. A further 16% of patients had stable disease, while 62% had progressive disease.

Median progression-free survival was 4 months, report Brian Rini (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA) and colleagues in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

And they emphasize: “It is important to note that although a small proportion of patients had an objective response to salvage ipilimumab and nivolumab, the responses […] were durable in the majority of responders, and several patients derived clinical benefit even without achieving RECIST-defined [partial response].”

Of the 23 patients who received ICI monotherapy immediately prior to the combination, three had a partial response to salvage nivolumab–ipilimumab, as did one of the six patients who received monotherapy with a VEGFR inhibitor.

By contrast, the five patients whose immediate prior treatment was an ICI combined with a VEGFR inhibitor all had progressive disease.

In total, 64% of patients experienced an immune-related adverse event (irAE) of any grade and 13% had a grade 3–4 event, which Rini et al describe as “acceptable.”

Nine percent of the study participants delayed treatment due to irAEs, while 13% discontinued as a result.

The researchers therefore believe that “[i]pilimumab and nivolumab may be an effective salvage treatment option for select patients with metastatic RCC with prior treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.”

But they highlight “the lack of complete responses, high rate of [progressive disease], and the potential for toxicity” and conclude that “[a]dditional investigation into this approach to define durability of response and benefit/risk is needed.”

medwireNews is an independent medical news service provided by Springer Healthcare. © 2020 Springer Healthcare part of the Springer Nature Group

J Clin Oncol 2020; doi:10.1200/JCO.19.03315

Related topics

See the research in context now

with trial summaries, expert opinion and congress coverage