Cardiovascular
 
Dermatology
 
Endocrinology
 
Internal medicine
 
Medicine (General)
 
Head and neck
 
Immunology
 
Neurology
 
Oncology
 
Bone health
 
Pediatrics
 
Mental health
 
Respiratory medicine
 
Surgery
 
Veterinary medicine
 
Regional news
 
Most popular
 
Archive News

medwireNews Interviews
 
Friendly Links


Follow me on Twitter
Bipolar I disorder has higher costs than other affective disorders
By Mark Cowen, Senior medwireNews Reporter
22 November 2012
J Affect Disord 2012; Advance online publication

medwireNews: Results from an Australian study show that bipolar I disorder (BD I) is associated with higher costs than bipolar II disorder (BD II) or unipolar depression.

The team found that the combined indirect and direct financial impact of BD I is greater than that of BD II or unipolar depression.

"These findings are inconsistent with past research suggesting that BP I and BP II conditions are equally costly illnesses, instead finding significant cost differences across a variety of parameters," comment Gordon Parker (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) and colleagues.

The findings come from a study of 44 patients with BD I, 102 with BD II, and 279 with unipolar depression attending a tertiary referral clinic in Sydney. The groups were similar in terms of illness duration, at around 20 years, and treatment history duration.

Indirect employment-related costs, such as those resulting from being absent from work due to illness, and direct costs, such as those resulting from medication, therapy, imaging, and hospitalization, were calculated using a variety of measures.

The researchers found that the mean indirect cost associated with BD I was AUS$ 134,318 (US$ 139,100, € 108,550) per year of illness, compared with $ 76,821 (US$ 79,557, € 62,082) for BP II and $ 68,347 (US$ 70,784, € 55,216) for unipolar depression.

The mean yearly direct costs associated with BD I, BD II, and unipolar depression were $ 26,353 (US$ 27,282, € 21,280), $ 17,579 (US$ 18,200, € 14,195), and $ 27,237 (US$ 28,199, € 21,994), respectively.

The combined indirect and direct costs were significantly higher in BD I than BD II or unipolar depression patients, while combined costs in BD II and unipolar depression patients were comparable.

The higher costs in BD I patients, compared with the other groups, were mainly due to a higher prevalence of government benefits, more time off work, and longer periods of time spent in hospital.

Parker and team summarize in the Journal of Affective Disorders: "Findings indicate that BD I illness generates more direct and indirect costs than BD II illness, while the latter was generally comparable with unipolar depression in terms of the lifetime cost."

They add: "Our findings could assist with priority-setting and lead to further investigation into the efficacy of particular treatments and interventions."

medwireNews (www.medwire-news.md) is an independent clinical news service provided by Springer Healthcare Limited. © Springer Healthcare Ltd; 2012

Free abstract

Comments
This article currently has no comments
Post a Comment

Please note, email address is required but not shown. Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been approved. Please see the disclaimer for more information