Cardiovascular
 
Dermatology
 
Endocrinology
 
Internal medicine
 
Medicine (General)
 
Head and neck
 
Immunology
 
Neurology
 
Oncology
 
Bone health
 
Pediatrics
 
Mental health
 
Respiratory medicine
 
Surgery
 
Veterinary medicine
 
Regional news
 
Most popular
 
Archive News

medwireNews Interviews
 
Friendly Links


Follow me on Twitter
Interferon retreatment warning in HCV
By Kirsty Oswald, medwireNews Reporter
04 February 2013
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 1: CD003617

medwireNews: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients who do not respond to interferon should not receive further treatment with the drug, say the authors of a new Cochrane review.

They found that patients with severe fibrosis who did not achieve a sustained viral response (SVR) with pegylated interferon and ribavirin had a high risk for mortality and adverse events when later given interferon monotherapy compared with patients who went without further treatment.

"Based on these results, interferon monotherapy cannot be recommended for chronic hepatitis C patients who have already failed one course of treatment and are being retreated," said author Ronald Koretz (Granada Hills, California, USA) in a press statement.

The authors reviewed data from seven trials including 1976 patients. In the complete data set, they found no association between repeated interferon treatment and overall mortality or hepatic mortality.

However, when they repeated their analyses using just two large trials with 1676 patients - "HALT-C" and "EPIC3" - that were considered to have a low risk of bias they found different results.

Patients who received low-dose pegylated interferon over 48 weeks had a 41% increased risk for death compared with patients who did not receive repeated treatment (9.4 vs 6.7%).

And, although patients who received further interferon were less likely to experience variceal bleeding than those who did not (0.5 vs 2.1%), there were no significant differences in rates of other end-stage liver disease manifestations such as encephalopathy, ascites, or hepatocellular carcinoma.

Furthermore, patients receiving the treatment experienced greater rates of adverse events like infections, flu-like symptoms, and rashes.

The authors note their review failed to find any evidence to support the use of SVR as a marker of treatment success. Patients receiving further treatment were 15 times more likely to achieve an SVR than untreated patients but there was no significant association between SVR and disease improvement or the risk for death.

"This tells us that as a treatment outcome it is not universally reliable and needs to be validated before it can be viewed as the goal of any therapy in other clinical scenarios," concludes Koretz.

medwireNews (www.medwirenews.com) is an independent clinical news service provided by Springer Healthcare Limited. © Springer Healthcare Ltd; 2013

Full free text

Comments
This article currently has no comments
Post a Comment

Please note, email address is required but not shown. Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been approved. Please see the disclaimer for more information